{"id":108284,"date":"2026-04-30T17:30:13","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T14:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/gjyqi-per-gazin-ne-kuvend-mbrojtja-me-verejtje-per-provat-e-prokurorise\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T17:30:13","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T14:30:13","slug":"gjyqi-per-gazin-ne-kuvend-mbrojtja-me-verejtje-per-provat-e-prokurorise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/gjyqi-per-gazin-ne-kuvend-mbrojtja-me-verejtje-per-provat-e-prokurorise\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjyqi p\u00ebr gazin n\u00eb kuvend, mbrojtja me v\u00ebrejtje p\u00ebr provat e prokuroris\u00eb"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"post-featured-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/prizrenpostog-og.jpg\" alt=\"Gjyqi p\u00ebr gazin n\u00eb kuvend, mbrojtja me v\u00ebrejtje p\u00ebr provat e prokuroris\u00eb\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>N\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Themelore n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb mbajtur seanca p\u00ebr gazin lotsjell\u00ebs n\u00eb Kuvendin e Kosov\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb gjykatore t\u00eb enjten jan\u00eb paraqitur t\u00eb akuzuarit Fitore Pacolli Dalipi, Salih Zyba dhe Drita Millaku.<\/p>\n<p>Ata akuzohen p\u00ebr ndezjen e bombolave t\u00eb gazit lotsjell\u00ebs m\u00eb 21 mars 2018 rreth or\u00ebs 12:10 e deri n\u00eb or\u00ebn 15:40.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb fjal\u00ebt hyr\u00ebse, mbrojtja e Salih Zyb\u00ebs, avokati Hasan Jashari tha se veprimet politike nuk jan\u00eb vep\u00ebr penale dhe se \u201ctymi i p\u00ebrdorur n\u00eb Parlamentin e Kosov\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim politik\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSe tymi i p\u00ebrdorur nga zot\u00ebri Zyba, a hyn n\u00eb grupin e arm\u00ebve, andaj eksperti ka obligim q\u00eb t\u00eb jap mendimin dhe konstatimin lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje dhe assesi t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb interpretim t\u00eb dispozitave ligjore dhe t\u00eb tregon se a \u00ebsht\u00eb fajtor. Ne si mbrojt\u00ebs konsiderojm\u00eb se ai tym q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur n\u00eb sall\u00ebn e parlamentit, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim politik, p\u00ebr t\u00eb pamund\u00ebsuar q\u00eb t\u00eb merret nj\u00eb vendim nga deputet\u00ebt e Parlamentit t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs, i cili vendim ka qen\u00eb i d\u00ebmsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr vendin ton\u00eb, ku n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb atij vendimi vendit ton\u00eb do t\u2019i merret 25 p\u00ebr qind e territorit. Konsideroj se veprimi politik nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vep\u00ebr penale\u201d, ka th\u00ebn\u00eb avokati i Zyb\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>Edhe avokati i Fitore Pacollit, Lavdrim Salihu tha se aktakuza \u00ebsht\u00eb e mang\u00ebt sa i p\u00ebrket aspektit kohor kur \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer vepra.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cE mbrojtura ime akuzohet se m\u00eb 21.03.2018 ora 12:10 deri n\u00eb 15:40 ka kryer vepr\u00ebn penale si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar. Kjo akuz\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e mang\u00ebt p\u00ebr shkak se n\u00eb aspektin kohor edhe pse kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me nj\u00eb veprim konkret, shkruhet interval kohor prej 23 or\u00ebsh. Nuk kemi konkretizim t\u00eb veprimeve t\u00eb secilit nga kryer\u00ebsit, edhe pse kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me kat\u00ebr kryer\u00ebs, si\u00e7 pretendon Prokuroria, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebrshkrimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. K\u00ebto t\u00eb meta komplemetohen edhe n\u00eb aspektin e provave. Pse? Se si\u00e7 shihet n\u00eb raportin me numrin referenc\u00ebs i nj\u00ebjti, k\u00ebto shkresa t\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00ebs p\u00ebrkojn\u00eb me l\u00ebnd\u00ebn q\u00eb n\u00eb Polici\u2026 k\u00ebto shkresa p\u00ebrkojn\u00eb me \u00e7\u00ebshtje juridiko-penale q\u00eb jan\u00eb trajtuar nga kjo gjykat\u00eb, e disa prej t\u00eb cilave edhe kan\u00eb marr\u00eb epilog\u201d, tha ai.<\/p>\n<p>Tutje, para trupit gjykues ai tha se \u201caktakuza mb\u00ebshtetet edhe n\u00eb prova t\u00eb pabazuara\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cN\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, aktakuza mb\u00ebshtetet edhe n\u00eb prova t\u00eb pabazuara, duke filluar prej raportit t\u00eb ekspertit t\u00eb IJD-s\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim edhe pse kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me raport, i cili n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast propozohet n\u00eb cil\u00ebsi t\u00eb ekspertiz\u00ebs, nuk mund t\u00eb kemi ne ekspertiz\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb kryeprov\u00eb n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje juridiko-penale derisa mund t\u00eb propozohet d\u00ebgjimi i ekspertit ose i p\u00ebrpiluesit t\u00eb raportit n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, p\u00ebr \u00e7ka \u00ebsht\u00eb obligim i prokuroris\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebshmoj\u00eb faj\u00ebsin\u00eb edhe normalisht q\u00eb t\u2019i mb\u00ebshtes provat q\u00eb i ka propozuar. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, n\u00ebse Prokuroria nuk propozon d\u00ebgjimin e t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit, i mbetet mbrojtjes t\u00eb propozoj\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin, edhe pse ky \u00ebsht\u00eb paradoks juridik sepse po propozohet nga ne q\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebshmojn\u00eb pafaj\u00ebsin\u00eb e jo Prokuroria t\u00eb d\u00ebshmoj\u00eb faj\u00ebsin\u00eb\u201d, ka th\u00ebn\u00eb ai.<\/p>\n<p>Prokurori Valdrin Krasniqi e ka kund\u00ebrshtuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e mbrojtjes s\u00eb Fitore Pacollit p\u00ebr caktimin e nj\u00eb eksperti, teksa tha se raporti i grupit t\u00eb ekspert\u00ebve \u00ebsht\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm i qart\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cE kund\u00ebrshtoj k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr caktimin e nj\u00eb eksperti, duke vler\u00ebsuar se raporti i ekspertimit, i lart\u00ebcekur \u00ebsht\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm i qart\u00eb, i cili v\u00ebrteton se t\u00eb pandehurit me dat\u00ebn 21.03.2018 kan\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur arm\u00eb, n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, gaz irritues si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb i p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb Ligjin p\u00ebr Arm\u00eb. Arsyeja e kund\u00ebrshtimit \u00ebsht\u00eb se ky raport gjen mb\u00ebshtetjen edhe me prova t\u00eb tjera materiale, si\u00e7 jan\u00eb raporti i k\u00ebqyrjes s\u00eb vendit t\u00eb ngjarjes, video-incizimet q\u00eb jan\u00eb propozuar dhe administrohen si prova gjat\u00eb k\u00ebtij shqyrtimi gjyq\u00ebsor, por edhe me vendimin e kryesis\u00eb s\u00eb Kuvendit t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs, dat\u00eb 21 mars 2018, n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb vendim q\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit prezent\u00eb k\u00ebtu p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb hedhjes s\u00eb gazit lotsjell\u00ebs t\u00eb ju shqiptohet masa disiplinore -ndalimi i pjes\u00ebmarrjes n\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e jasht\u00ebzakonshme t\u00eb kuvendit\u201d, ka th\u00ebn\u00eb ai.<\/p>\n<p>Kjo k\u00ebrkes\u00eb e avokatit \u00ebsht\u00eb refuzuar edhe nga trupi gjykues.<\/p>\n<p>Tutje, mbrojtja e Fitore Pacollit, avokati Lavdrim Salihu ka pasur v\u00ebrejte p\u00ebr provat materiale t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSa i p\u00ebrket raportit 04\/2-1I\/023\/2019 i propozuar si raport ekspertimi duhet t\u00eb shpallet si prov\u00eb e papranueshme dhe t\u00eb ve\u00e7ohet nga shkresat e l\u00ebnd\u00ebs si prov\u00eb e paartikulueshme n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 19, p\u00ebr shkak se nuk dihet kush e ka p\u00ebrpiluar k\u00ebt\u00eb raport, p\u00ebr \u00e7ka n\u00ebse edhe lexohet si prov\u00eb do t\u00eb na i pamund\u00ebsoj\u00eb propozimin e p\u00ebrpiluesit, n\u00eb cil\u00ebsi t\u00eb d\u00ebshmitarit apo ekspertit, prov\u00eb kjo q\u00eb do t\u00eb ishte shfaj\u00ebsuese apo do t\u00eb d\u00ebshmoj\u00eb paq\u00ebndrueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e prov\u00ebs. Sa i p\u00ebrket vendimit t\u00eb kryesis\u00eb s\u00eb kuvendit, i nj\u00ebjti nuk mund t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbej\u00eb si prov\u00eb p\u00ebr shkak se kryesia e kuvendit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb organ kompetent p\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar elementet e vepr\u00ebs penale, p\u00ebr \u00e7ka natyrisht se edhe jemi paraqitur para gjykat\u00ebs\u201d, tha ai.<\/p>\n<p>V\u00ebrejtje p\u00ebr deklarimet e prokuroris\u00eb pati edhe i pandehuri, Salih Zyba.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDeklarimi i tij n\u00eb fjal\u00ebn e par\u00eb hyr\u00ebse ke \u2018ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka parapar\u00eb\u2019, ky ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsin \u00ebsht\u00eb duke e kontestuar tash, jo pasoj\u00ebn, por vet qenien ton\u00eb\u2026 Dhe ishte kontravers sepse n\u00eb fjalin\u00eb e fundit \u2018t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit gjat\u00eb asaj seance kan\u00eb konsumuar dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb masa disiplinore\u2019 q\u00eb n\u00ebnkupton ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi ka rregulluar edhe normat kur cil\u00ebsohet, konsiderohet vep\u00ebr penale dhe kur eventualisht si n\u00eb rastin konkret, kur vep\u00ebr penale dhe kur shkelje disiplinore, dhe n\u00ebse ka qen\u00eb vep\u00ebr penale paska qen\u00eb masa disiplinore n\u00eb kund\u00ebrth\u00ebnie me normat\u201d, tha Zyba.<\/p>\n<p>Edhe ai, nj\u00ebjt\u00eb si avokati, tha se l\u00ebnda nuk ka ekspertiz\u00eb.. I akuzuari, Salih Zyba e quajti prokurorin\u00eb e asaj kohe si \u201ct\u00eb kapur\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKur \u00ebsht\u00eb ekspertiz\u00eb ose grup profesionale, kam k\u00ebnaq\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe obligimin q\u00eb t\u00eb komunikoj\u00eb me ta, jo me akuza t\u00eb prokuroris\u00eb s\u00eb kapur n\u00eb at\u00eb koh\u00eb, e cil\u00ebsoj\u00eb, jo me mediume t\u00eb pambik\u00ebqyrura, jo profesionale dhe k\u00ebtij aktiviteti n\u00eb kuvend i ka paraprir\u00eb q\u00ebndrimi, aktivitete publik dhe politik dhe simbolik dhe nj\u00ebher\u00ebsh duke u bazuar n\u00eb dokumentet zyrtare shtet\u00ebrore nj\u00eb ekspertiz\u00eb sa i p\u00ebrket cil\u00ebsimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrkufizimit t\u00eb rolit t\u00eb detyrave t\u00eb deputetit apo si\u00e7 e cil\u00ebsoj\u00eb ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi m\u00eb her\u00ebt\u201d, tha ai.<\/p>\n<p>Prokurori Valdrin Krasniqi ka k\u00ebrkuar nga trupi gjykues q\u00eb t\u2019i t\u00ebrhiqet v\u00ebrejtjen Zyb\u00ebs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cK\u00ebrkoj nga gjykata q\u00eb t\u2019ia t\u00ebrheq v\u00ebrejtjen t\u00eb pandehurit Salih Zyba p\u00ebr m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn si\u00e7 i referohet institucionit t\u00eb Prokurorit t\u00eb Shtetit. Sa i p\u00ebrket kontestimit t\u00eb raportit t\u00eb ekspertit \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb\u2026 ky raport p\u00ebrmban t\u00eb gjitha elementet t\u00eb cilat duhet t\u2019i p\u00ebrmbaj\u00eb nj\u00eb raport, un\u00eb d\u00ebgjova me v\u00ebmendje k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e t\u00eb pandehurit Salih Zyba, i cili theksoi se n\u00eb raport duhet t\u00eb ceket prejardhja e k\u00ebtyre arm\u00ebve. Raporti e p\u00ebrmban k\u00ebt\u00eb informat\u00eb\u201d, tha ai.<\/p>\n<p>Avokat\u00ebt kan\u00eb propozuar q\u00eb t\u00eb shikohen video-incizimet nga data kur pretendohet se \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer vepra penale, me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ngarkohen t\u00eb pandehurit.<\/p>\n<p>Seanca e ardhshme do t\u00eb vazhdoj\u00eb me shqyrtimin e video-incizimeve, p\u00ebr \u00e7ka gjyqtari Sabit Sadikaj ka marr\u00eb aktvendim q\u00eb seanca e radh\u00ebs t\u00eb shtyhet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb pacaktuar, ku mund t\u00eb mbahet seanca n\u00eb nj\u00eb sall\u00eb ku shfaqen k\u00ebto prova t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb.<\/p>\n<hr style=\"margin:30px 0\"\/>\n<p style=\"font-size:13px;color:#666\">Burimi: <strong>mesazhi<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Themelore n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb mbajtur seanca p\u00ebr gazin lotsjell\u00ebs n\u00eb Kuvendin e Kosov\u00ebs. N\u00eb gjykatore t\u00eb enjten jan\u00eb paraqitur t\u00eb akuzuarit Fitore Pacolli Dalipi, Salih Zyba dhe Drita Millaku. Ata akuzohen p\u00ebr ndezjen e bombolave t\u00eb gazit lotsjell\u00ebs m\u00eb 21 mars 2018 rreth or\u00ebs 12:10 e deri n\u00eb or\u00ebn 15:40. N\u00eb fjal\u00ebt hyr\u00ebse, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":94304,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3803],"class_list":["post-108284","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-kombetare","tag-aktuale"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108284","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108284"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108284\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/94304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/al\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}