{"id":50447,"date":"2026-06-15T19:46:41","date_gmt":"2026-06-15T17:46:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/yuksek-mahkeme-kosova-polisindeki-terfi-surecini-askiya-aldi\/"},"modified":"2026-06-15T19:46:41","modified_gmt":"2026-06-15T17:46:41","slug":"yuksek-mahkeme-kosova-polisindeki-terfi-surecini-askiya-aldi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/yuksek-mahkeme-kosova-polisindeki-terfi-surecini-askiya-aldi\/","title":{"rendered":"Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme Kosova Polisindeki terfi s\u00fcrecini ask\u0131ya ald\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n PA.nr.16\/2026 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla bu idari talimat\u0131n 7. maddesinin 2, 3, 4 ve 5. f\u0131kralar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131, yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7te nihai karar verilinceye kadar ge\u00e7ici olarak yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Dava, 10 Haziran’da V.Z. Vitia, terfi s\u00fcrecinde liyakat ve e\u015fit muamele ilkesini ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131yla hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131 ve ihtilafl\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin k\u0131smen iptalini talep etti.<\/p>\n

Davada sunulan iddialara g\u00f6re, ihtilafl\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmler, Kosova Polisinde en az on y\u0131l aktif deneyime sahip olan ve bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda terfi etmemi\u015f polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6nceki g\u00f6revdeki asgari kal\u0131\u015f s\u00fcresiyle ilgili k\u0131s\u0131tlamalara tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 anda iki \u00fcst r\u00fctbeye ba\u015fvuruda bulunabilmesine olanak tan\u0131yor. <\/p>\n

Davac\u0131, b\u00f6yle bir d\u00fczenlemenin “d\u00fczenli terfi prosed\u00fcrlerinden ge\u00e7en ve ilgili r\u00fctbelerle ilgili g\u00f6revleri, sorumluluklar\u0131 ve mesleki deneyimi yerine getiren belirli bir polis memuru kategorisi i\u00e7in bir avantaj yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131” savundu.<\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin Kosova Polisi i\u00e7indeki yap\u0131 hiyerar\u015fisi ve emir komuta zinciri \u00fczerinde yaratabilece\u011fi etkiye ili\u015fkin endi\u015felerini de dile getirdi.<\/p>\n

“\u0130tiraz edilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131y\u0131 ve emir komuta zincirini ihlal edebilir Kosova Polisi b\u00fcnyesinde, \u00c7avu\u015f r\u00fctbesinde denetim ve liderlik g\u00f6revlerini yerine getirmeyen polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6n terfi s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinden ge\u00e7mi\u015f ve denetleyici pozisyonlarda ilgili deneyimi kazanm\u0131\u015f memurlarla ayn\u0131 prosed\u00fcrle, Te\u011fmen r\u00fctbesi i\u00e7in do\u011frudan rekabet etmelerine olanak sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in” diyor davan\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi.<\/p>\n

Talebi ve sunulan belgeleri inceledikten sonra Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, \u00d6zel G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirinin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin yasal ko\u015fullar\u0131n, Kanun’un 100. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirdi. \u0130dari Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar kar\u015f\u0131lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde “davac\u0131n\u0131n ihtilafl\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin hukuka uygunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin, yasal yetkiyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, meritokrasi ilkesinin ihlali, hiyerar\u015fi ve emir-komuta zinciri \u00fczerinde n\u00fcfuz, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ve muhakeme eksikli\u011fi iddialar\u0131 da dahil olmak \u00fczere ciddi iddialarda bulundu\u011funu” vurgulamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca terfi prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn devam\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki sonu\u00e7lara yol a\u00e7mas\u0131 riskinin bulundu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir: sonradan d\u00fczeltilmesi zor veya imkans\u0131z olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

“Mahkeme, talebin \u00f6n de\u011ferlendirmesinde, ihtilafl\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ve bunlara dayal\u0131 terfi i\u015flemlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam edilmesi durumunda ciddi ve geri d\u00f6n\u00fclemez bir zarara yol a\u00e7ma riskinin ger\u00e7ek oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca, bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici olarak durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 ciddi \u015fekilde ihlal etmedi\u011fini ancak orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesine uygun oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay’a g\u00f6re, \u0130tiraz konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin hukuka uygunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin nihai karar verilmeden terfi i\u015fleminin sona erdirilmesinin geri d\u00f6n\u00fclemez sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furabilece\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n

“Terfi i\u015fleminin yarg\u0131 denetimine konu olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere dayan\u0131larak ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve esasl\u0131 karardan \u00f6nce sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n geri d\u00f6n\u00fclemez sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furabilece\u011fi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Mahkeme, nihai karara kadar mevcut durumun \u00f6zel sigorta tedbiri yoluyla s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin gerekli oldu\u011fu kanaatindedir” gerek\u00e7esinde vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay, \u015fu hususa a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k getirmi\u015ftir: bu karar yaln\u0131zca davan\u0131n \u00f6n incelemesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve davan\u0131n nihai sons\u00f6z\u00fcne halel getirmez. No.lu \u0130dari Talimat\u0131n itiraz edilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin hukuka uygunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin nihai karar. 01\/2026 karar\u0131, davan\u0131n ilgili adli prosed\u00fcrde tam olarak incelenmesinden sonra al\u0131nacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\n

Kaynak: prizrenpost<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n PA.nr.16\/2026 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla bu idari talimat\u0131n 7. maddesinin 2, 3, 4 ve 5. f\u0131kralar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131, yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7te nihai karar verilinceye kadar ge\u00e7ici olarak yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava, 10 Haziran’da V.Z. Vitia, terfi s\u00fcrecinde liyakat ve e\u015fit muamele ilkesini ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131yla hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131 ve ihtilafl\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin k\u0131smen iptalini talep etti. Davada sunulan iddialara g\u00f6re, ihtilafl\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":50448,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-adli"],"views":4,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50447"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50449,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50447\/revisions\/50449"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}