![](\"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Seanca-Apeli.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4 Mart 2026’da derlenen karara g\u00f6re, \u0130pek Temel Mahkemesi’nin Arton Duraku’yu 5 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis, Nezir Duraku’yu da 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131ran karar\u0131n\u0131 teyit eden Temyiz, ma\u011fdur taraf olan \u0130pek Temel Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n \u015fikayetlerini ve san\u0131k savunmas\u0131n\u0131 temelsiz bularak reddetti. hapis cezas\u0131.<\/p>\n
“\u0130pek Temel Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n, ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131n yetkili temsilcisi Say\u0131n E.\u015e. ve san\u0131k Say\u0131n Shefqet Ibrahimi ile san\u0131k Say\u0131n Nezir Duraku’nun itirazlar\u0131 reddedilirken, \u0130pek Temel Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n PKR. nr. 22\/2025 karar\u0131 onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Temyiz karar\u0131nda “Yemin” ifadesi yer almaktad\u0131r. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n “Klankosova.tv” yay\u0131n\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130ddia makam\u0131, usul ihlalleri, maddi durumun yanl\u0131\u015f do\u011frulanmas\u0131 ve ceza hukukunun yanl\u0131\u015f uygulanmas\u0131 iddias\u0131yla karar\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini ve daha a\u011f\u0131r cezalar verilmesini talep etmi\u015fti. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde ma\u011fdurun ailesinin vekili ve ma\u011fdur olan E.\u015e.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan Arton Duraku’nun savunmas\u0131, ilk su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 cezan\u0131n indirilmesini ve beraatini istemi\u015fti. ikinci su\u00e7 i\u00e7in ise Nezir Duraku beraat veya davan\u0131n yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fclmesini talep etmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131\u00e7lar Mentor Hajra, Xhevdet Abazi ve Valbona Musliu-Selimaj’dan olu\u015fan Temyiz Heyeti, ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n esasl\u0131 bir ceza muhakemesi ihlali i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi, fiili durumun tam ve adil bir \u015fekilde tespit edildi\u011fi ve cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirmesinde bulundu. <\/p>\n
Temyiz karar\u0131na g\u00f6re Temel Mahkeme, cezai su\u00e7lar\u0131n nihai kasttan ihmale d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in yeterli ve ikna edici gerek\u00e7eler sunmu\u015ftur. Bu sonu\u00e7, esas olarak Arton Duraku’nun kazay\u0131 \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in harekete ge\u00e7ti\u011fini ancak \u00e7arp\u0131\u015fman\u0131n h\u0131z\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve kar\u015f\u0131 \u015feride ge\u00e7mesi nedeniyle meydana geldi\u011fini tespit eden trafik s\u00fcper uzmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dayanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yard\u0131m sa\u011flamama cezai su\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak, Temyiz Mahkemesi, bu su\u00e7lar\u0131n temel formunda yeniden e\u011fitim verilmesinin adil oldu\u011funu, zira adli t\u0131p uzman\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fdurun \u00e7ok k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede a\u011f\u0131r kanamadan \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc tespit etti\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle mahkemeye g\u00f6re, ceza gerektiren su\u00e7lar\u0131n nitelikli hali i\u00e7in ko\u015fullar olu\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fduru canl\u0131 g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f ve yard\u0131m \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 duymu\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, nihai yard\u0131m\u0131n olay\u0131n niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi kurtar\u0131c\u0131 bir etkisi olmayaca\u011f\u0131 vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/p>\n
Temyiz heyeti, cezalar\u0131n davan\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131yla orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirdi. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha \u00f6nce h\u00fck\u00fcm giymemi\u015f olmas\u0131 hafifletici neden olarak dikkate al\u0131n\u0131rken, ma\u011fdurun ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olmas\u0131, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir \u00e7ocuk babas\u0131 olmas\u0131, yard\u0131m teklif etmeden olay yerinden ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 ve su\u00e7unu gizlemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 da a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 neden olarak de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p>\n
Nezir Durak i\u00e7in a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 neden olarak a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 neden olarak ise a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 sebep olarak kabul edildi. Kaza sonras\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u015fleme kast\u0131n\u0131n derecesi, olay yerini terk etme ve olay\u0131 saklama \u00e7abalar\u0131.<\/p>\n
Bu arada yaral\u0131 E.\u015e.’nin cezaya ili\u015fkin karar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki di\u011fer gerek\u00e7elerle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet, Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 381. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca kabul edilemez bulunarak reddedildi.<\/p>\n
Dava, bir\u00e7ok yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131ndan ge\u00e7mi\u015fti. \u0130lk duru\u015fmada Arton ve Nezir Duraku toplam 15’er hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Bu karar Temyiz taraf\u0131ndan onayland\u0131 ancak daha sonra Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan iptal edildi ve dava yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Birka\u00e7 yeniden yarg\u0131lama prosed\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u0130pek Temel Mahkemesi 4 Kas\u0131m 2025’te Arton Duraku’yu 5 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na, Nezir Duraku’yu da 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131rd\u0131; bu cezalar daha \u00f6nce de Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan onaylanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. \u0130ddiaya g\u00f6re kaza, 21 Kas\u0131m 2022’de Klina’n\u0131n Jashanic\u00eb k\u00f6y\u00fcnde meydana geldi. S\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesi olmayan Arton Duraku, ruhsats\u0131z ve teknik a\u00e7\u0131dan kural d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir kamyonla kar\u015f\u0131 \u015feride ge\u00e7erek polis \u00f6\u011frencisi F.\u015e.’nin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 “Opel” adl\u0131 araca \u00e7arparak hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti. <\/p>\n
\u0130ddianameye g\u00f6re, kazan\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Arton ve Nezir Duraku kamyondan inerek ma\u011fdurun yan\u0131na geldi ancak yard\u0131m teklif etmedi ve olay yerinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
Kaynak: prizrenpost<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 4 Mart 2026’da derlenen karara g\u00f6re, \u0130pek Temel Mahkemesi’nin Arton Duraku’yu 5 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis, Nezir Duraku’yu da 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131ran karar\u0131n\u0131 teyit eden Temyiz, ma\u011fdur taraf olan \u0130pek Temel Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n \u015fikayetlerini ve san\u0131k savunmas\u0131n\u0131 temelsiz bularak reddetti. hapis cezas\u0131. “\u0130pek Temel Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n, ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131n yetkili temsilcisi Say\u0131n E.\u015e. ve san\u0131k Say\u0131n […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":51283,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51282","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-adli"],"views":8,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51282","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51282"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51282\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51284,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51282\/revisions\/51284"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prizrenpost.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}